Ask
your own question, for FREE!
Chemistry
15 Online
***MEDAL*** An amateur scientist tells you he has a stable atom of 84 Po 212, why is that unlikely? A. No atoms are stable. B. Amateur scientists don't know anything. C. There are no stable nuclei with more than 83 protons. D. Male scientists can't be trusted. Definitely not B or D!
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
I will go for C Belt of stability elements beyond the atomic number of 83 are unstable radioactive elements. http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Physical_Chemistry/Nuclear_Chemistry/Nuclear_Stability_and_Magic_Numbers
Can't find your answer?
Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Latest Questions
Aubree:
Guys, what does love feel like? I've been getting a tight chest and when I talk to him my heart rate hangs out around 100-120 beats per min, and when he doe
thereneelg:
ok... anyone have advice?? ...I did Choir all throughout Middle school and have ALWAYS been put in Soprano those three years.
kamariana:
The Byzantine Procopius is known for (5 points) reconquering much of the old Roma
chuckD:
hellp!!! what does it mean to describe a scientist as skeptical Why is sceptical
DoltonCarlee:
So like do y'all know anything about the first world war?
thehearken:
anyone know how to explain this so its easier for me to understand? b(1)=2, b(n)=
4 hours ago
8 Replies
1 Medal
1 day ago
6 Replies
1 Medal
2 days ago
0 Replies
0 Medals
2 days ago
2 Replies
1 Medal
1 day ago
2 Replies
0 Medals
1 day ago
5 Replies
2 Medals