The Supreme Court interpreted the Fifth Amendment in

Gideon v. Wainwright to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights
Gideon v. Wainwright to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it
Miranda v. Arizona to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it
Miranda v. Arizona to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights

Question

The Supreme Court interpreted the Fifth Amendment in

 Gideon v. Wainwright to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights
 Gideon v. Wainwright to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it
 Miranda v. Arizona to mean states must pay for counsel if the defendant cannot afford it
 Miranda v. Arizona to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights

anonymous · Answer

Gideon v. wainwright to mean that accused people have a right to be informed of their rights