OpenStudy (anonymous):
A medical researcher experimented with the effects of calcium intake on the healing time of broken bones. People who had similar broken bone injuries were divided randomly into two groups, one of which received a calcium supplement and one of which received a placebo. The data showed that there was no significant difference in healing times between the two groups, so the researcher concluded that calcium intake has no effect on bone healing time. Why is the conclusion of the researcher not justified? The researcher did not use a control group. The bone injuries in different people cannot be compared. The overall calcium intake of the two groups was not considered. The data can only give a statistical probability, so no conclusion can be made.
OpenStudy (anonymous):
what do you think it is?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
glomore600:
find someone says that that one person your talking to doesn't really like you should I take their advice and leave or should I ask the person i'm talking t
Addif9911:
Him I dimmed the light that once felt mine, a glow I never meant to lose. I over-read the shadows, let voices crowd the room where only two hearts shouldu20
EdwinJsHispanic:
Poem to my mom who proved my point "You proved my point, I am a failure. but I kinda wish, you were my savior.
Wolfwoods:
The Modern Princess "you spoke so softly to me, held me close when no one else did, loved me in a way no one else dared to.
Wolfwoods:
The Pain Of Waiting "The short story would be that we fell in love, you left and I continued to wait for you.
notmeta:
balance the following equation - alumoinum chlorate --> alumninum chloride + oxyg
notmeta:
If \(P(A) = 0.4\), \(P(B) = 0.7\), and \(P(A \cap B) = 0.2\), what is the value o