In 1948 the State of Israel was established. The year before, the United Nations made a plan for dividing the land between Jews and Arabs. They hoped it would solve the conflict between the two groups. People on both sides were against the plan. Based on the map, which statement provides an argument that both sides might make against the plan? The sections of land for both did not have access to the sea. The land area for Arabs was much larger than for Jews. The sections of land for each group were not all connected. The land area for Jews was much larger than for Arabs.
Help with social studies questions.? - Yahoo Answers https://answers.yahoo.com/question/?qid=20120306112415AAjHFu2 Mar 6, 2012 - ... that the governments of India, China, and Japan have in common? 19. What aspect of Iran's government makes it oligarchic? ...show more ... United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia, the ... en.wikipedia.org/.../United_Nations_Partition_Plan_for_Palesti... Wikipedia Part I of the Plan stipulated that the Mandate would be terminated as soon as possible and the United ... 4.1 Reports of pressure for and against the Plan ... In 1938 the British government issued a policy statement declaring that "the political, .... to both the Arabs and the Jews, and asked that the General Assembly provide an ...
Can you attach the graph please?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Partition_Plan_for_Palestine maps on here
kk
I'd go with B
wait, sorry I mean C
:)
The sizes are about the same so B and D can be ruled out, you can see they both have access to the sea, so it's not A. That leaves C. And on the graph you can see two parts aren't connected.
thanl yuo
No problem, good luck.
yw
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!