Ask your own question, for FREE!
History 9 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

The Supreme Court extended the right of privacy implied by the 14th and Fourth Amendments to include protection from use in a trial of evidence that was seized A. illegally, in the case Mapp v. Ohio B. illegally, in the case Roe v. Wade C. through a warrant, in the case Mapp v. Ohio D. through a warrant, in the case Roe v. Wade

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Tatsurion

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Haichi

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think its D

OpenStudy (haichi):

a warrant means they can take ur stuff for examination

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It is D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

because mapp vs ohio are illegal

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!