Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 13 Online
OpenStudy (godlovesme):

Write a statement that is logically equivalent to the statement below. Demonstrate it is logically equivalent by citing evidence to justify your statement: If today is a weekday, then it is not Saturday. original -> if p then q logically equivalent( contrapositive) -> if not q then not p logically equivalant statement: If it's Saturday, then today isn't a weekday.

OpenStudy (godlovesme):

is that good enough? @Directrix

OpenStudy (godlovesme):

@Leader :)

OpenStudy (leader):

I guess :)

OpenStudy (leader):

Well anything you do is perfect, so... :)

OpenStudy (godlovesme):

lol thanks :) @Leader

Directrix (directrix):

If today is a weekday, then it is not Saturday. p: today is a weekday q: today is Saturday original -> if p then ~ q The contrapositive is logically equivalent to the original statement. Contraposite: If NOT ~ q, the ~ p. If q, then not p. If today is Saturday, then then today is not a weekday.

OpenStudy (godlovesme):

thanks @Directrix :)

Directrix (directrix):

What does this mean you are to do: Demonstrate it is logically equivalent by citing evidence to justify your statement:

OpenStudy (leader):

citing evidence: http://openstudy.com/study#/updates/54e11266e4b07f4a24c02041

OpenStudy (leader):

;)

Directrix (directrix):

What is the evidence?

OpenStudy (godlovesme):

evidence ? @Leader o.O ?

OpenStudy (godlovesme):

the link is my question lol

Directrix (directrix):

I can't get the link to open for some reason.

OpenStudy (godlovesme):

it's my current question @Directrix xD

OpenStudy (leader):

Haha. Took you guys a while to figure it out ;)

OpenStudy (godlovesme):

xD pfftttt not really @Leader

Directrix (directrix):

How long is it going to take for you to deliver the evidence? @Leader :)

OpenStudy (godlovesme):

it really took a while -_- @Leader

OpenStudy (leader):

@Directrix They usually give me a week in court. But I don't think @Godlovesme has that much time. ;P

OpenStudy (godlovesme):

hahahahaha :') lol

Directrix (directrix):

@Godlovesme I am thinking that the evidence is/are the steps I wrote in explaining how to get the contrapositive from the original statement. I don't know what else it could be.

OpenStudy (godlovesme):

that makes sense :) thanks guys @Directrix and @Leader (TsO) ;)

OpenStudy (leader):

Np :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!