If the suspect is found guilty, then he will go to prison. Which of the following is a logically equivalent statement to the conditional statement above? If the suspect does not go to prison, then he was not found guilty. If the suspect goes to prison, then he was found guilty. If the suspect is not found guilty, then he will not go to prison. If the suspect is not found guilty, then he will go to prison.
second one sounds like the converse of the statement
third one sounds like negation
|dw:1424225649156:dw|
first one is contrapositive
second sentence would probably be equivalent....the last one is crazy but hey you never know with the cops in real life these days. They jail anyone now
we are looking for a logical equivalence and neither the first and second one is equivalence
then what is it third? sorry man it's been a year since I last did this.
let us try to use letters and symbols instead if A then B
misspoke
you're right
oh yeah A -> B or in my book P -> Q OH see! :P
converse of the statement is B... still holds true.. this is like the P -> Q implies table
yes weren't you just doing set theory last year? laughing out loud
yeah..now I'm doing matlab.. my third code crashed and it was an example one too. ugh
second sentence sounds right for equivalence.
correct
now do you know matlab?
no
:/ I'm wondering why the example code crashed.
Thanks :)
wait the set you did crashed?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!