Which best describes the way photographs are considered by historians?

primary source documents that are useful in the study of history

reliable sources for the study of history only if from a named source

secondary source documents that are useful in the study of history

unreliable sources for the study of history because they are too subjective

useful sources for the study of personal histories, but not for general history

Question

Which best describes the way photographs are considered by historians?



primary source documents that are useful in the study of history



reliable sources for the study of history only if from a named source



secondary source documents that are useful in the study of history



unreliable sources for the study of history because they are too subjective



useful sources for the study of personal histories, but not for general history

anonymous · Answer

C?

paki · Answer

yes agree... have a look here for details... @lebayhohmann http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and_using_primary_and_secondary_sources

anonymous · Answer

ive taken this a thousand times with these same answers and I fail everytime.