What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck? A. They both understood how mutations occurred, but Darwin was able to support it with evidence. B. They both understood how mutations occurred, but Lamarck was able to support it with evidence. C. They both tried to explain evolution, but Darwin was able to support it with evidence. D. They both tried to explain evolution, but Lamarck was able to support it with evidence.
@Ondinana @KendrickLamar2014 @sleepyjess
i know b and d are wrong
i am pretty sure it is c
Do you know who Charles Darwin is?
yep
his is a scientist who observed animals and there characteistics
i think c
C is correct. Darwin went on an expedition to the Galapagos Islands. I could write a novel on him. But I'll keep the explanation short.
thx
He had a journal and recorded his findings in it, therefore he was able to support his theory with evidence.
No problem c:
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!