The following claim is made in an argumentative essay:

The United States should require all citizens to be listed as organ donors.

Which of the following would be considered ineffective evidence to support this claim?

Examples of situations when organ donations have saved lives
Facts from a documentary about mechanical and artificial hearts
Statistics showing the number of lives saved by organ donors each year
Testimony from the emergency room doctors and patients who have been saved

Question

The following claim is made in an argumentative essay:

The United States should require all citizens to be listed as organ donors.

Which of the following would be considered ineffective evidence to support this claim?

 Examples of situations when organ donations have saved lives
 Facts from a documentary about mechanical and artificial hearts
 Statistics showing the number of lives saved by organ donors each year
 Testimony from the emergency room doctors and patients who have been saved

anonymous · Answer

I think D

anonymous · Answer

@TwilightRain1 @KyanTheDoodle

texaschic101 · Answer

not 100% sure about this....but notice how the second one is only dealing with artificial hearts...no other organs. Do you think that might make a difference ?

anonymous · Answer

Ohhhhhhhhh...... yeah ur right! any second opinions??

anonymous · Answer

I think you're incorrect...

texaschic101 · Answer

but like I said...not 100% sure...simply because facts on a documentary are a credible source...but they are wanting them to be organ donors...not just heart donors

anonymous · Answer

ok so then what do you think @NeonStrawsForever ??

anonymous · Answer

Probably B?????

anonymous · Answer

Hope that doesn't count as a direct answer.

anonymous · Answer

lol ok ill go with b then :) thx

anonymous · Answer

You're welcome ^_^

anonymous · Answer

new post watch out!! ^_^

anonymous · Answer

well, actually i dont need more help!! lol im finished!! thx anyway guys i might need help in a while :P bye!!!