Kelly and Daniel wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Kelly's Proof Statement Justification ∠2 = ∠4 Vertical angles are congruent. ∠1 = ∠3 Vertical angles are congruent. Vertical Angles are congruent. Vertical Angle Theorem Daniel's Proof Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠2 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠2 = ∠1 + ∠4 Transitive Property of E
Both Kelly and Daniel are correct. Neither Kelly or Daniel is correct. Kelly is correct, but Daniel is not. Daniel is correct, but Kelly is not.
Hint: We cannot prove a theorem using the theorem itself. The theorem is not a justification until it is proved by other means.
daniel is correct kellys not?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!