Instructions: The following argument argues for advertising to children. Read the argument and answer the following question:

Question

anonymous · Answer

Why is the argument ineffective? In a paragraph of 7-10 complete sentences, explain why the following parts of the argument are ineffective, and how they can be improved:

Claim
Support
Conclusion Clincher
Point of View
Transitions

Topic and Question

Advertising: Should companies be allowed to advertise to children?

Ineffective Argument

I think that advertising to children is necessary. How else will we know what we can buy?

I think that children are not aware of the products that are available. Most children don't own cars and can't drive to stores to look around. The only way we know what we can buy is by seeing advertisements on TV. My friend really likes advertisements, too.

He said, "How will we know what to buy if we don't see advertisements?"
Seriously, children are consumers, too. We know what we like and we ask our parents to buy these products for us. I know that I like certain cereals, but how would I know that if I did not see advertisements?

I love those commercials! Kids are people, too.

anonymous · Answer

@selfconfidence777

selfconfidence777 · Answer

where the answer choices?

anonymous · Answer

its not multiple question just explain why the argument is ineffective

anonymous · Answer

and then i will write an essay based off of your answer

selfconfidence777 · Answer

In her point of view she uses the word I a lot. She should not do that and instead replace them with other words rather than I or You. Hur transitions are not that great, In her second paragraph she left a sentence with saying something about her friend liking the commercials too and then in the next paragraph started talking about the same thing. 

^^^ THIS IS all what i can giv you

anonymous · Answer

thank you