Question

Free speech should have limitations, why or why not?

Answer 1

If it's free speech you shouldn't have any limitations, however make sure to be respectful.

Answer 2

essay?

Answer 3

Well...

Toward government; not really, as long there is no harm done. We should be allowed to voice our options toward governments, right?

Anywhere else, yeah should be limited. I mean it's isn't cool to scream "FIRE!" in movie theater or something, right lol?

Second amendment doesn't imply that we can say ANYTHING ANYWHERE.

Answer 4

wherever you cross you freedom and got to others freedoms it becomes
limit to speech freely. e.g illustrated by @greekry in the theater and similar places

Answer 5

whenever*

Answer 6

Yes, I am working on an essay. With the recent events in Garland, TX I thought I write about freedom speech and limitation and I thought the why's and why nots will help me to narrow down my opposition.

Answer 7

to speak freely*
sorry about miss typing

Answer 8

although this the wrong place to post English related question

Answer 9

what do you think yourself? any idea to go with or against speech limitations

Answer 10

How embarrassing... I mean First Amendment

Answer 11

I believe people abuse the freedom of speech act with limitations, just maybe we can avoid all this public hate.