In the Scott v. Sandford case, Sandford argued that
A.an enslaved person in a free state should be granted freedom.
B.a person’s property can’t be taken away without due process.
C.enslaved workers should not be considered property.
D.enslaved workers should have the right to a trial by jury.

Question

In the Scott v. Sandford case, Sandford argued that
A.an enslaved person in a free state should be granted freedom.
B.a person’s property can’t be taken away without due process.
C.enslaved workers should not be considered property.
D.enslaved workers should have the right to a trial by jury.

anonymous · Answer

What would you say @DiamondJamison

anonymous · Answer

C?

anonymous · Answer

That seems correct but if you wanna find out 100% take a look at these websites: http://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/antebellum/landmark_dred.html http://www.oyez.org/cases/1851-1900/1856/1856_0/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford