Ask your own question, for FREE!
Social Sciences 16 Online
OpenStudy (vera_ewing):

Discussion: The nature of anthropology and sociology.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I love how abbot attacks girls on the internet cuz he's mad he'll never get near one in real life

OpenStudy (anonymous):

lmao

OpenStudy (abb0t):

Sociology and anthropology for one ARE like twins. they both seek to find the social and cultural forces that inflence human behavior. sociologists who are more interested in social relations and structures like race, ethnicity, social class, gender, etc., anthropologist are also concerned with the physical and cultural development of human beings from the time of their origin to this day.

OpenStudy (abb0t):

hahaha. she so mad. i thought this was a discussion, not an attack. Stick to the subject at hand here.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

uh, no. Anthro has biological components that sociology rarely uses. There are different fields in Anthro just like there is for EVERY major

OpenStudy (abb0t):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociobiology

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Sociology is the systematic study of society

OpenStudy (abb0t):

Then, explain that.

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

that is the issue when you do not use biological components like genetics, it limits your studies specially in the study of epidemiology

OpenStudy (anonymous):

like i said sociology "RARELY" uses biology

OpenStudy (abb0t):

Then, can you explain why theres a field called sociobiology?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i agree that biology is needed in sociology. Sociology is highly flawed because they think everything is a social construct. This is very DUMB of people who hold PhD's to think this way. Race is not only a social construct but it is also very much genetic/biological.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Also sociology is flawed in that they only consider the black and white paradigm in race and ethnicity studies. Very closedminded.

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

im not reading that so give me a summary

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Also, whenever people say race is a social construct i say 2 words to disprove them: East Asians. Nuff said

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

I am not concerned with who started or coined what, but when it comes to rigorous scientific methods, Malinowski established it in the field of Anthropology, which sociology later on adopted along the works of Franz Boaz and people that followed him like Claude Lévi-Strauss.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So what? that's just methodology. EVERYBODY uses it.

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

we can discuss about Comte for all that matters, but his field work was not sound

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

methodology is important in science

OpenStudy (anonymous):

agreed but so what? EVERYBODY in the social sciences uses it

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that doesn't prove that sociology is a "baby version of anthro"

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

not to the same extent and rigor before Malinowski

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

I will tell you how that part is true.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Sociology and anthro is different also there are more Soc majors than anthro majors in america

OpenStudy (anonymous):

SOC is much more popular *flips hair*

OpenStudy (anonymous):

nin just shutup and help me with math

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

ah Du Bois is appropriately more described as an anthropologist than a sociologist, but splitting hair does not do service to his work because both field refer to him in the same manner.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

who cares about Du Bois he's an idiot. He advocated assimilation

OpenStudy (anonymous):

He didn't even give 2 fawks about ethnicity

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

You can not entirely dismiss someone based on a few flukes of his or her works.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and im pretty sure du bois admired Nazi Germany

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

ethnicity and nationality have a very weak divide between the two, but in view of sociology and anthropology, this becomes highly subjective based on circumstances.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

he visited Nazi Germany and had nothing but good things to say about them

OpenStudy (anonymous):

KARL MARX FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! POWER TO THE PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

just as no sociologist nor anthropologist would dismiss Malinowski because of the racist or supremacist remarks he wrote in his diaries.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

DUDE NIN can u help me with a simple math problem please

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

ye, math is used frequently in anthropological studies particularly when we delve into Epidemiology which is a huge subject for both sociology and anthropology.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hey Zale i don't disrespect the natural sciences i highly respect it unless someone attacks me and my major. Then i'll unleash hell on them.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Nin what do you know about epistemic privilege?

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

|dw:1439236540938:dw|

OpenStudy (anonymous):

|dw:1439236587202:dw|

OpenStudy (nincompoop):

that's a sad venn diagram you drew for one, it is not factual and I think we both agree that there is no scope of sociology that anthropology doesn't do

OpenStudy (anonymous):

|dw:1439236639419:dw|

OpenStudy (anonymous):

|dw:1439236701083:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!