While reading two articles on the CIA’s functions, you discover that both articles have similar opinions and facts, but the first article’s author is a reporter and the second article’s author is a former CIA employee. Which article would be more relevant to your research?

the first article because it contains less bias

the first article because it is more objective

the second article because it contains more generalizations

the second article because it has a more reliable viewpoint

Question

While reading two articles on the CIA’s functions, you discover that both articles have similar opinions and facts, but the first article’s author is a reporter and the second article’s author is a former CIA employee. Which article would be more relevant to your research?

the first article because it contains less bias

the first article because it is more objective

the second article because it contains more generalizations

the second article because it has a more reliable viewpoint

anonymous · Answer

will become a fan and give a meddle

photon336 · Answer

The third answer is wrong, because they both have similar view points and facts. so it's less likely that one is more biased or objective than the other.

photon336 · Answer

I think the answer has to deal with who's providing the facts. I think someone who works for the CIA would have a much more reliable view point.