Ask
your own question, for FREE!
History
25 Online
Which of the following best explains why secondary sources are important to historians? A. They summarize conclusions about primary sources. B. They are the least biased source available for any subject . C. They provide firsthand accounts of historical events. D. They put historical events in the correct chronological order. I think it is A.
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
A
Thank you, :)
Let me know if you need any other help :)
I will thanks again! :)
Can't find your answer?
Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Latest Questions
glomore600:
find someone says that that one person your talking to doesn't really like you should I take their advice and leave or should I ask the person i'm talking t
Addif9911:
Him I dimmed the light that once felt mine, a glow I never meant to lose. I over-read the shadows, let voices crowd the room where only two hearts shouldu20
EdwinJsHispanic:
Poem to my mom who proved my point "You proved my point, I am a failure. but I kinda wish, you were my savior.
Wolfwoods:
The Modern Princess "you spoke so softly to me, held me close when no one else did, loved me in a way no one else dared to.
Wolfwoods:
The Pain Of Waiting "The short story would be that we fell in love, you left and I continued to wait for you.
notmeta:
balance the following equation - alumoinum chlorate --> alumninum chloride + oxyg
notmeta:
If \(P(A) = 0.4\), \(P(B) = 0.7\), and \(P(A \cap B) = 0.2\), what is the value o
1 hour ago
4 Replies
0 Medals
1 day ago
4 Replies
0 Medals
1 day ago
6 Replies
2 Medals
2 days ago
11 Replies
3 Medals
2 days ago
7 Replies
2 Medals
2 days ago
4 Replies
1 Medal
3 days ago
9 Replies
3 Medals