Ask your own question, for FREE!
History 10 Online
OpenStudy (practice111):

Anti-federalists believed that a bill of rights was (3 points) unnecessary because the Declaration of Independence listed many individual rights unnecessary due to the structure of government and rights under the Constitution necessary because the Constitution did not specify protection for individual rights necessary because laws would not follow rights in the Declaration of Independence

OpenStudy (practice111):

@marilope

OpenStudy (practice111):

@killer27

OpenStudy (practice111):

think is C @killer27

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I also believe C

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!