Below is a two-column proof incorrectly proving that the three angles of ΔPQR sum to 180°: Statements Reasons ∠QRY ≅ ∠PQR Alternate Interior Angles Theorem Draw line ZY parallel to segment PQ Construction m∠ZRP + m∠PRQ + m∠QRY = m∠ZRY Angle Addition Postulate ∠ZRP ≅ ∠RPQ Alternate Interior Angles Theorem m∠RPQ + m∠PRQ + m∠PQR = m∠ZRY Substitution m∠ZRY = 180° Definition of a Straight Angle m∠RPQ + m∠PRQ + m∠PQR = 180° Substitution Which statement will accurately correct the two-column proof? A.The measure of angle ZRY equals 180° by definition of supplementary angles. B. Angles QRY and PQR should be proven congruent after the construction of line ZY. C. The three angles of ΔPQR equal 180° according to the Transitive Property of Equality. D. Line ZY should be drawn parallel to segment QR.
@MyNameIsNemo @iloveyou;*
could really use some help...
Holy crap thats long one sec I have to answer a msg
omg :/ i suck at math so bad :/ so sorry :/ i can help you in any other subject except math :/
It's fine. I'll figure it out I guess. Don't worry about it @iloveyou;*
I'm pretty good at math
One second
Take your time
That is honestly a rediculous question considering its a given that every triangles angles add up to 180 .-.
ridiculous*
Is this on your computer?
My god my grammar is going to make me sick today .-. I need to start proof reading my statements.
@KGabriel99 is this on your computer or phone?
Computer.
Sorry, I was doing something @MyNameIsNemo
Its np, mac or windows?
Can u SS it
Windows
SS?
@imqwerty
any help?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!