Ask your own question, for FREE!
Physics 21 Online
OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

Mystery? Fake? Or What?

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

will post pic in a sec

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

|dw:1446791128875:dw| |dw:1446791139885:dw| how is it possible there is no wind on the moon, but the flag is developing on a wind!

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

|dw:1446791298940:dw|

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

also, where are the stars?

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Get out

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

|dw:1446792441280:dw| what about this one? |dw:1446792464608:dw|

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

|dw:1446792530517:dw| |dw:1446792565927:dw|

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

@TheSmartOne

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

how sad it is, there were actually no Americans on the moon facts: The level of technological development of NASA did not allow a man to be on the moon. The lack of stars in the photos from the lunar surface. Film astronauts had melted from the midday temperature on the Moon . Various optical anomalies in the photos. Waving flag in a vacuum . Smooth surface instead of craters that were formed by landing the lunar module from their engines.

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

more facts: The rocket "Saturn 5" up close and did not meet the stated load capacity of 130 tons. The second stage of "Saturn 5" had a kerosene-oxygen engines

OpenStudy (anonymous):

And I saw Elvis at WalMart today.

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/5833633/Apollo-11-Moon-landing-conspiracy-theories-debunked.html Seems to have a good rebuttal to all conspiracy theories However, there was a new... complication that arose. A recent NASA scientists said in an interview that it's almost impossible for humans to get past the Van-Allen radiation belt that separates the moon and Earth due to the high radiation waves Wait what? Then how did we get to the moon? Before I wasn't really leaning towards disbelieving the lunar landings, but I'm confused how he says we can't get past the belt, and yet we did. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlXG0REiVzE There were reports saying that the astronauts experience adverse side affects which didn't last.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I still require stronger evidence to believe that we faked the landing.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I guess I shouldn't say impossible to get past -- just very dangerous and risky!

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

there is no explanation for the flag, how can it develop on the wind where there is no wind? where are the stars? on the videos astronauts walk like on earth not like on the moon, craters? and the retouched photo? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

Look at the picture on the left, supposedly filmed by the astronauts, "Apollo 11". Armstrong and Aldrin - the same height, but here the shadow of one of the astronauts and a half times longer than the other. Perhaps their searchlight illuminated top, and therefore turned the shade of various lengths as a street lamp. And by the way, who shot this photo? Indeed, in the frame of the two astronauts at once. http://www.skeptik.net/conspir/moon_pic/armoldf.jpg

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

And what is there in the photograph of the white spots? Yes this is the spotlights! what about spotlights on the moon? it is not a sun, not stars, http://www.skeptik.net/conspir/moon_pic/lights.jpg

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

The sun shines directly on it in the back of the photographer, but the shadow of the lunar module is suffering a left deviationism. In even greater extent this applies to the rocks on the right side of the image, which clearly highlights the right. This effect is gradually eroding as you move to the left side of the image. Can not your "surface roughness" so change the direction of the shadows! http://www.skeptik.net/conspir/moon_pic/as11-40-5962.jpg

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

Why on different photographs - the same background? http://www.skeptik.net/conspir/moon_pic/hills1.jpg http://www.skeptik.net/conspir/moon_pic/hills2.jpg

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

resoures: wipedia, lukmore, skeptic.net

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

At the center of the frame - compartment, strong sunlight and occupying a significant portion of the frame, and all around - a whole bunch of stars! So the astronauts in space had Stars in the photographs , and on the lunar surface - they hadn't! Or maybe compartment poorly lit? For example, the sun hid behind a `space cloud`? http://www.skeptik.net/conspir/moon_pic/apollo13.jpg

OpenStudy (alexandervonhumboldt2):

have a read people: http://www.skeptik.net/conspir/moonhoax.htm

TheSmartOne (thesmartone):

very interesting read

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!