Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 20 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

What are the missing reasons in the two -column proof? Given: Line MO bisects angle PMN and line OM bisects angle PON Prove: Triangle PMO is congruent to triangle NMO Statements/Reasons 1. Line MO bisects angle PMN/ 1.???? 2. Angle PMO is congruent to angle NMO/ 2.???? 3. Line NO is congruent to line NO/ 3.???? 4. Line ON bisects angle PON/ 4.???? 5. Angle POM is congruent to angle NOM/ 5.???? 6. Triangle PMO is congruent to triangle NMO/ 6.????What are the missing reasons in the two -column proof?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i know that 3 is reflective 4 is given 6 is asa and 2 and 5 are both angle bisector theorem .

OpenStudy (anonymous):

can you see the image?

OpenStudy (dayakar):

no

OpenStudy (anonymous):

for all you see this in the future just give an answer so that others can be helped.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!