What are the missing reasons in the two -column proof? Given: Line MO bisects angle PMN and line OM bisects angle PON Prove: Triangle PMO is congruent to triangle NMO Statements/Reasons 1. Line MO bisects angle PMN/ 1.???? 2. Angle PMO is congruent to angle NMO/ 2.???? 3. Line NO is congruent to line NO/ 3.???? 4. Line ON bisects angle PON/ 4.???? 5. Angle POM is congruent to angle NOM/ 5.???? 6. Triangle PMO is congruent to triangle NMO/ 6.????What are the missing reasons in the two -column proof?
i know that 3 is reflective 4 is given 6 is asa and 2 and 5 are both angle bisector theorem .
https://www.connexus.com/content/media/467863-2172011-61003-PM-1009443722.png
can you see the image?
no
for all you see this in the future just give an answer so that others can be helped.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!