Ask your own question, for FREE!
History 19 Online
OpenStudy (rose4825):

Which situation was legal according to the decision in the case of Commonwealth v. Hunt? a. a labor union organizing a strike b. a militia dispersing a strike c. imprisoning striking workers d. flogging persons found guilty of violent crimes

OpenStudy (rose4825):

@bzdz @Serenity74

OpenStudy (rose4825):

I think it is A

OpenStudy (serenity74):

Hmm why?

OpenStudy (rose4825):

Because Commonwealth vs Hunt the ruling by the MA supreme court was that it was legal for labor unions and the legality of union workers striking if an employer hired non-union workers, as long it was peaceful

OpenStudy (anonymous):

b

OpenStudy (serenity74):

Yea @bzdz is swinging in the right direction

OpenStudy (rose4825):

there was no militia dispersing an attack

OpenStudy (anonymous):

rose what grade are you in

OpenStudy (rose4825):

10

OpenStudy (rose4825):

why

OpenStudy (rose4825):

My friend @AaronAndyson I did. this is a history question

OpenStudy (aaronandyson):

WTH..!? I thought im in the math section. SO SORRY :(

OpenStudy (rose4825):

No problem :)

OpenStudy (aaronandyson):

And I think the ans to your question is b

OpenStudy (rose4825):

Why?

OpenStudy (aaronandyson):

Again , I said I "think" so.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!