Which situation was legal according to the decision in the case of Commonwealth v. Hunt?
a. a labor union organizing a strike
b. a militia dispersing a strike
c. imprisoning striking workers
d. flogging persons found guilty of violent crimes
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (rose4825):
@bzdz @Serenity74
OpenStudy (rose4825):
I think it is A
OpenStudy (serenity74):
Hmm why?
OpenStudy (rose4825):
Because Commonwealth vs Hunt the ruling by the MA supreme court was that it was legal for labor unions and the legality of union workers striking if an employer hired non-union workers, as long it was peaceful
OpenStudy (anonymous):
b
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (serenity74):
Yea @bzdz is swinging in the right direction
OpenStudy (rose4825):
there was no militia dispersing an attack
OpenStudy (anonymous):
rose what grade are you in
OpenStudy (rose4825):
10
OpenStudy (rose4825):
why
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (rose4825):
My friend @AaronAndyson I did. this is a history question
OpenStudy (aaronandyson):
WTH..!?
I thought im in the math section.
SO SORRY :(
OpenStudy (rose4825):
No problem :)
OpenStudy (aaronandyson):
And I think the ans to your question is b
OpenStudy (rose4825):
Why?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!