Fill in the missing information on the proof.
ok, where you at
I think I figured out the first one I think, M angle 2 90d is = M angle 3 90d?
the general idea is just that 1 + 2 = 90 = 3 + 4 and 2=3 therefore 1 =4 from that
the first two lines a and b, are th egiven statements
those are first usually
following the logic, next they saya larger angle is the sum of two smaller ones that make up the larger, , i guess that is the property name they did
Yeah.
you want to get to say angle 1= angle 4, logically without assuming anything
Yeah,without plugging.
the next is probably saying 1 +2 = 90 and 3+4=90,
it is given the bigger angle is 90, and it is composed of the smaller two angles 1 + 2, putting together you say that 1 + 2 = 90, although obvious, you have to state it i guess
Yeah it's weird. I really don't like it.
like c = a + b and c = 25, you say also now, a+b=25 from that property they put there
I get what it's trying to say and somewhat how to figure it out. But I just don't know what to put.
the next one may be the same reason, using the substitution thing it is known know 1 + 2 = 90 3 + 4 = 90 also given that 3 = 2 so with 3 and 2 the same, 1 and 4 must be the same
For D I put Angle 1 and 2 =90 and angle 3 and 4 =90.
Now I'm trying to figure out how to word F. Seeing as how E is angle 1 + angle 2 = angle 2 + angle 4 which is obviously 90 when both are added together
yeah looking at the whole proof, i would put the D as 1 + 2 = 3 + 4 substitution, the 90 is already shown
then to get from that to the next, they substituted the given that 2 = 3, 1 + 2 = 2 + 4
from that, they subtract angle 2 , leaving the final proof statement, 1 = 4
Ok, I think I understand now. I can finish the reasons on my own. Thanks for your help.
i can reason some of the proofs, the names for the properties is what i cant remember,
k, goodluck
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!