- the first family tree of primes till 50,edited logically using my formula 2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23 29 31 37 41 43 47 - please opinions !!! - thank you very much jhonyy9
@ganeshie8 @ParthKohli @zepdrix @mathmale @Hero @satellite73 @robtobey @radar @AravindG @surjithayer @IrishBoy123 @ikram002p @
very good work how did u get that idea but find some relation to remember easily
Hey I'd like to understand this... could you please explain a bit more @dayakar or @jhonyy9 :)
like, what is the formula ? is there any obvious pattern in the tree that i am missing ?
- i have tought this starting from human family tree - and on the end of September i have got my idea about one formula - what using i can editing family tree of primes - than it is ussafully i can continue it again ...----
@ganeshie8 sorry but i need to go now on my workplace here in Europe - Hungary on pm 14 o clock but i promiss you that in the night after 22 when i coming back in my home i will reply to you - sorry but this formula i think wan or need being secret again - or not ? how you think it ? sincerelly - jhonyy9
|dw:1452774516302:dw| from 1 to 10 every body knows from 11 to 100 this is one of easy method to remember here , line segments which are drawn are not prime[ similar line segments] circled numbers are divisible by 7 not prime remaining are prime
do you wan to know this formula like @ganeshie8 - yes ?
Here's my opinion, should be this: 2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23 29 31 37 41 43 47
sorry i think not is because 11 and 13 need being together because are twins
yes ?
Yeah but remember 5 is a twin prime with 3 and 7 so technically isn't it a triplet?
so and today on my workplace i have got one new idea - that using this formula i can generate new and new twins and in next days i will edit or i will try to edit the first family tree of thwins - i think will work sure
u shud make 11 and 17 closer
so my opinion that not are triplet because 5 is twin with 3 and 5 is twin with 7 but 3 not is twin with 7 - i think it so
so than i wan make it more easy understandably - i think it this way 2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23 29 31 37 41 43 47
so 47 will be next 43
and on this line with 43
I can,t see a formula here. The closest thing to pinpointing primes is the Riemann Hypothesis which has,not been proved yet.
@welshfella ! so than i will edit and post here on openstudy.com/mathematics the first family tree of twin primes so you will believe me that i have a formula what i have used editing these ,,family tree of primes" ? - so already work in the subject
@jhonyy9 Do you have a formula that can generate prime numbers ?
hi @ganeshie8 - yes i have
so this i have said above that i can editing family tree of primes and of twin primes using this formula - but because how you have wrote above this is very very new i the world of math ,so i think is right than i keep it in secret - or how you think ?
so and how i have wrote above to @welshfella i work to edit the family tree of twins too and hope so much that in the next days i will can posting it here on openstudy/matematics - ok ?
- and i have new ideas like ,,conjecture" - so what i dont know than it is possibil to be today in mathematics ,but really i have and about primes and these ,because these are two conjecture ,so origin,providing from this formula
too
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!