Which of the following describes a disadvantage secondary sources have compared to primary sources?

A. They do not rely on historical evidence to support their conclusions.
B. They focus too closely on a single piece of evidence instead of providing summaries.
C. They are created by people who have never experienced the historical period they describe.
D. They are extremely rare and much harder for historians to locate.

Question

Which of the following describes a disadvantage secondary sources have compared to primary sources?

 		A.	They do not rely on historical evidence to support their conclusions.
 		B.	They focus too closely on a single piece of evidence instead of providing summaries.
 		C.	They are created by people who have never experienced the historical period they describe.
 		D.	They are extremely rare and much harder for historians to locate.

hayhayz · Answer

Hi Welcome to OpenStudy! Please post your questions in the correct subject for others to help! You are currently in OpenStudy Feedback so if you just click on that you can search for the subject you need help in ! ☺