Ask your own question, for FREE!
English 13 Online
OpenStudy (barrelracing):

will fan and medal

OpenStudy (batmano3):

Im listening :) what is it>

OpenStudy (barrelracing):

OpenStudy (batmano3):

So do you understand what logos is ??

OpenStudy (barrelracing):

no not really

OpenStudy (batmano3):

okay so logo is one of the rhetorical appeals, pathos, ethos, logos means logic and you would use logic to appeal to your target audience

OpenStudy (barrelracing):

oh ok

OpenStudy (batmano3):

So do you have a better understanding on what to do now?

OpenStudy (barrelracing):

basically say wheter this paragraph has the info to back it up?

OpenStudy (batmano3):

Yes and how it uses that info to persuade the readers to agree or understand the topic

OpenStudy (barrelracing):

ok after i type it can you just look over it?

OpenStudy (barrelracing):

you dont have to wait here u can just go to other stuff while i do it. up to you

OpenStudy (barrelracing):

is this good? This statement is effective in the terms of logos. It states exactly what they are discussing in the hook sentence. They speak about the monumental 1966 case of Miranda vs. state of Arizona. This case made police officers tell the person being arrested his or her rights to an attorney. They tell us that a valid confession cannot be used unless the counsel is present or has been waved. @batmano3

OpenStudy (danielheyliger):

Yea that's good but try to add abit more information about it

OpenStudy (batmano3):

^^yes like daniel says a little more info and your good, detail is important

OpenStudy (barrelracing):

ok i will

OpenStudy (danielheyliger):

Ok we don't mind helping u

OpenStudy (barrelracing):

thank you both. i am adding some stuff now.

OpenStudy (barrelracing):

This statement is effective in the terms of logos. It states exactly what they are discussing in the hook sentence. They speak about the monumental 1966 case of Miranda vs. state of Arizona. This case made police officers tell the person being arrested his or her rights to an attorney. They tell us that a valid confession cannot be used unless the counsel is present or has been waved. Now they aren't saying that counsel has to be present when interrogation is made or confession is taken, they are saying rules are unwise without merit. They say that they might not be very wise rules to adopt.

OpenStudy (batmano3):

Thats Good :) Great job!

OpenStudy (batmano3):

Please medal me :) i medaled daniel and would appreciate it for a fan and medal as well!

OpenStudy (danielheyliger):

Yea me too I will do the same

OpenStudy (barrelracing):

thank yall both for the help

OpenStudy (danielheyliger):

No problem anytime u can fan me and tag me

OpenStudy (danielheyliger):

Pm me barrcelracing

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!