the table shows the rainfall, in inches, in the month of july for the years 2006 through 2011 A)in what way could the graph be misleading? B) how could you redraw the graph so that it is less misleading?
@MysticFury @rebeccaxhawaii @KamiBug @563blackghost
year: 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 rainfall: 4.5 4.4 4.1 4.2 3.9 4.0
@ILovePuppiesLol
@smartnerd1111 @Luigi0210
@Qwertty123
;-; have to go to supper! :( sorry
@ace-n-it @AloneS
@jabez177 @jigglypuff314
I haven't done this in a while. Sorry. :(
At least try please I really need this answer
@rebeccaxhawaii I might get you wrong...
no she would get me even wronger lol I already talked to her no offence Rebecca
its okay fluttershy i didnt see the chart that you made. i havent had sleep but i can try. the graph may be misleading because it, it rises and falls as if its calculating each month in between the years when it is actually just being recorded each year.
the chart is year: 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 rainfall: 4.5 4.4 4.1 4.2 3.9 4.0
and then I got this
`"A : The graph is very misleading as it indicates that the rainfall is declining by more than a half every two successive years or so. Where as in the original table, all the values are around 4."` ~ @ganeshie8
thanks
`"B : To make the graph look less misleading, start the scale of vertical axis at 0 instead of 3.8."` ~ @ganeshie8 All credit goes to @ganeshie8 .
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!