Question

- something incredible
- how is this possible ?

1=2

???????????

Answer 1

anonymous Best Response Medals 0
ln(x)=∫1/x=∫2/(2x)=ln(2x)
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
hi @ganeshie8
3 months agoReport Abuse
qh 99
ganeshie8 Best Response Medals 0
im familiar with this
il let somebody else figure this out this time :)
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
how do you think can i have new conjecture in world of primes ? because i think that i have got some - 1-2-3 ???
3 months agoReport Abuse
qh 99
Kainui Best Response Medals 1
Ahhh yeah this is a fun trick to fool people I forgot about this one haha.
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
@ganeshie8 excuze me for your derange - i m technician electronics - the mathematics is one my bige hobby - and i think that i havent with who i can talking these interestingly math idea what i got ,i have - you dont have something idea please for how can i share these with math-world - yes if it's worth
3 months agoReport Abuse
qh 99
Kainui Best Response Medals 1
Here's two hints:

Rules of logarithms

Indefinite integrals
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
@ganeshie8 and because you are here @Kainui how you think it please ?

can we name the twins with sum of members +/- 1 generate in first round new twins too - so can we name these twins perfectly twins ?

opinions ? - this may be my first conjecture - that is possibly
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
for example

5-7

5+7=12
12 +/- 1 = 11-13

so this mean that 5-7 are perfectly twins
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
29-31

29+31 = 60

60+/-1 = 59-61

so these same first example
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
29-31 are perfectly twins
3 months agoReport Abuse
qh 99
Kainui Best Response Medals 1
Oh that's really cool I like that!
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
and what is your opinions about absolutely twins ? so this mean that a perfectly twin like 5-7 with sum of members = 12+/-1 generate new twin like in this case 11-13 and than we assum 11+13=24 but 24x3=72+/-1 = 71-73
so this mean that 5-7 are perfectly twins
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
hope so much that i write it understandably - pardon for my grammatically errors
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
@ganeshie8 so this is the way how i have got these biger twins of 2591-2593
3 months agoReport Abuse
qh 99
Kainui Best Response Medals 1
Hmm I sort of understand, but I don't know what absolutely twins are. Does this mean it leads to a chain of twin primes? Specifically what is this?
24x3=72

why 3?
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
yes 72+/-1 = 71-73 new twin
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
this is a way what i have got to generate new primes and /or twins
3 months agoReport Abuse
qh 99
Kainui Best Response Medals 1
What is 3, why not 4 or 5?
3 months agoReport Abuse
qh 99
Kainui Best Response Medals 1
24x5=120 but 119 and 121 are not twin primes.
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
and again something interestingly

2+2=4+/-1 = 5-7
5+7=12+/-1=11-13
11+13=24x3=72+/-1=71-73
71+73=144
144x3=432+/-1=431-433
431+433=864
864x3=2592+/-1 = 2591-2593
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
this is the biger directly family tree of twins what i have got using this way
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
@ganeshie8 - how you like it - please ?
3 months agoReport Abuse
qh 99
Kainui Best Response Medals 1
Hmm it seems kind of arbitrary and doesn't hit all the twin primes but it is interesting and fun to play with.
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
yes this is true but remember in case of human family tree not everybody are kin or direct descendant - yes ?
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
so why not can being this possibly so in the world of primes too ?
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
@ganeshie8
@ParthKohli

????- opinion
3 months agoReport Abuse
qh 99
Kainui Best Response Medals 1
True true, not all primes are related. This is interesting I'm gonna keep playing with these and I'll tell you if I find anything. Right now just working on making a program to find the longest chain of these in Java. Do you program?
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
sorry no - than you read my above wrote words i m technician electronist and the mathematics is one of my big big hobby - i like -love it because my opinion that is the best logically subject from all over the world
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
these i have wrote to @ganeshie8 to and than i have something interestingly like new conjecture - for example - so i dont know how or with who need talking this for i can deciding than is right or not is importantly or not ,---- ???
3 months agoReport Abuse
qh 99
Kainui Best Response Medals 1
Well you should spend some time learning just a little bit of basic programming, it would be a great tool for you!
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
why do you think it so ? i know that in the computer world use to much prims and ...
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
and so in the bank sector with money to generate different codes of bankcards or bank accounts - i have heard it so - and because have said me one my college of work and i have got these two prims from what was created the cvv code of my bank card - so this mean that this make sens - right
3 months agoReport Abuse
61
matlee Best Response Medals 0
I dont get it but if it could be explained i wanna see
3 months agoReport Abuse
99
SolomonZelman Best Response Medals 1
ln(x)=∫dxx=∫22xdx=ln(2x)+C=ln(x)+ln(2)+C=ln(x)+C
3 months agoReport Abuse
99
SolomonZelman Best Response Medals 1
This is why, also,
ddxln(αx)=ln(x)+ln(α)=1x+0=1x

(and using the chain rule, the result obained is same)
3 months agoReport Abuse
qh 99
Kainui Best Response Medals 1
One thing to keep in mind is that we can write ALL numbers of these form (mod 6 arithmetic):

6n, 6n+1, 6n+2, 6n+3, 6n+4, 6n+5

All of these for n>0 are composite and can be factored except 6n+1 and 6n+5 which is really the same as 6n+1 and 6n-1.

All twin primes greater than the pair (3,5) are of the form 6n-1 and 6n+1 so if you add them together like you've done:

6n-1 + 6n -1 = 12n = 6(2n) then you have a possibility of having 6(2n)-1 and 6(2n)+1 for another twin prime again!
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
@Kainui - thank you for your words but little missed term there so 6n-1+6n-1= 12n-2 and not just 12n like how you wrote above
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
i think you wan adding there 6n-1+6n+1 = 12n - in this way is right sure
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
@saifoo.khan
@satellite73

please your opinion about these ?

thank you very much
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
@jim_thompson5910 - please
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
@SamBot - please read these comments and i wait your opinion about them
3 months agoReport Abuse
40
SamBot Best Response Medals 0
um im only in middle school i have no idea!!
3 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
Dear CHAMPIONS !

- samthing new bout primes

5 - 7
------

5+7=12 +/- 1 = 11 - 13
--------

11+13=24 x 3 = 72 +/- 1 = 71 - 73
--------

72+73=144 x 3 = 432 +/- 1 = 431 --- 433
------------

431+433=864 x 3 = 2592 +/- 1 = 2591 ----- 2593
----------------

- so than you see these all twins what have resulted begin this line with 5 - 7
every resulted twins has members ending in 1 and 3 - so not is this very very interesting ?

- than we begin it by

17 --- 19
----------

17+19=36 x3 = 108+/- 1 = 107 --- 109
------------

107 +109 = 216 x3 = 648+/-1 = 647 --- 649
------------

- so than you see them started by 17 and 19 every resulted twins has mambers ended in 7 and 9 - not is interesting too ?

29 --- 31
---------

29+31 = 60 +/-1 = 59 --- 61
---------

59+61=120 x3 = 360+/-1= 359 --- 361
------------

- so every two twins has members ending in 59 and 61 - how much interesting it these ?

3 months agoReport Abuse
77
FaiqRaees Best Response Medals 0
Originally Posted by @SolomonZelman
ln(x)=∫dxx=∫22xdx=ln(2x)+C=ln(x)+ln(2)+C=ln(x)+C

End of Quote
In this I think you've done a mistake.
ln(2)≠0
2 months agoReport Abuse
71
baru Best Response Medals 0
He's lumping constants together. ln(2) + C is another constant
2 months agoReport Abuse
46
anonymous Best Response Medals 0
@jim_thompson5910 please than you check the above wrote case about super twins so than what you think about star twins please ? thank you in advance
19 days agoReport Abuse
Type your reply