Question

I am doing a research paper on "Was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified?" Which side should I pick? Which side is easier to argue?

Answer 1

Well, I say you should look at it through different perspectives first off, then decide if it was or if it wasn't justified. You can start by digging deeper into the topics by putting yourself into both sides of the story and basically arguing with yourself :3

Answer 2

Before we can help you, you have choose the side which you’re going to support. Once you’ve done that, simply provide several reasons to justify your choice, and we can started! :D

Answer 3

Alright I finally picked a side. I believe dropping the bomb wasn't justified. Can you help me with thesis

Answer 4

Well, I'm glad you chose that side. :3
Now, can you tell me why you chose against the dropping of the bombs (these reasons will help you later on in the essay)?

Answer 5

I need help with the thesis

Answer 6

Basically, create a sentence that describes your topic.

Answer 7

thx.

Answer 8

bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were justified due to the casualties of Pearl Harbor, to maintain the safety of the nation, and to stop the Japanese empire from growing stronger.

Answer 9

The organisation is good, however, the reasons are a bit off. The bombs were dropped to stop the war, which may have saved lives.

Answer 10

how can i improve it?

Answer 11

The bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were justified due to the casualties of Pearl Harbor...

Answer 12

and write about ending the war, the bombs ended the war.