Help please Which of the following best explains the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore? It decided that Florida’s first recount should resume in all disputed counties until completed and Bush was the winner. It decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was unconstitutional and Bush was the winner. It decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was appropriate according to the Constitution. It decided that Florida’s first recount was against the Constitution and states cannot order recounts in any future election.
On December 12, 2000, more than a month after Election Day, the Supreme Court settled the issue in Bush v. Gore and decided that the Florida Supreme Court did violate the Constitution with its decision to order a new recount. President-elect Bush would take office the next month.
so B...
Don't tell them the answer!
Let them think it on their own!
uhm i did think of it twice but i got it wrong both times
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @mmarliee uhm i did think of it twice but i got it wrong both times \(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\) @Ineedhelplz, that means your answer is incorrect. Mind helping some more? :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!