In the current CEO chat, I think we can all agree that it is considered to be a discussion about topics relating to OpenStudy, and Brainly. My posts were completely relevant to OpenStudy, discussing actions that Jay took on OpenStudy that related to this situation. This was the moderators response. http://prntscr.com/bgu1px http://prntscr.com/bgty2j
What's up bubby
Tick tock.
I really hate it when my posts get deleted. It's so stupid that they can't reason better than me so they just delete my posts.
Apparently voicing my opinion and adding to a discussion is considered to be spam
Like really, if you're that much more correct than me, why can't you show it rather than delete my posts like a coward? Lame.
waiting
Oh but if it does, it only further proves our point.
nyahaha
http://prntscr.com/bgu3or Snuggie's response as to why the posts were getting deleted.
I got my post deleted also.. it was a post thanking openstudy lel. but whatevah.
Make a post about Jay, complain about Jay, sure but spamming the post about OpenStudy/Brainly with 'it's all jay's fault' is considered spam
I made a statement about Jay and what he did on OS. I did not complain about him, nor say "it's all jays fault."
If I did, please find that in deleted messages and show me. I would like to see that
We repeatedly deleted a response that was not on topic and repeatedly asked you to stop talking about that subject. You refused and continued to copy and paste the same comment. That is spam. Rebecca, I don't know what your comment was. If it got deleted it simply might have been a slip of the hand.
Yes, making a statement "about Jay and what he did to OS" had nothing to do with 'Brainly has acquired OpenStudy'
It does, just like the fact that we're speculating that OS will be shut down.
If you dont' want us saying mean things about other users why not make sure other users don't do stupid things that result in the truth being let out?
http://prntscr.com/bgu1px "Here on this post we talk about Brainly and OpenStudy" not "Brainly has acquired OpenStudy"
Nothing we said was really slanderous... speaking the truth, however ugly it may be, is not slander.
No snug you didn't delete, it was a different incident but same issue.
Jay was punished accordingly for the troubles he caused. Blaming him further is pointless
Jay's punishment is not relevant to the situation. The fact that the site got sold in part because preetha doesn't like paying 4k does.
Blaming him? In what post was I blaming? I merely said what he did, which everyone can agree, he did, in one way or another.
Or maybe it doesn't.
hi<3
Does that mean the next person that takes down a site and costs it money won't keep the site owner from thinking twice about that model of business?
I was just discussing what was being discussed. http://prntscr.com/bgu6qd You talked about it yourself @jigglypuff314 So is talking about Jay relevant or not?
\(\color{blue}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @inkyvoyd Jay's punishment is not relevant to the situation. The fact that the site got sold in part because preetha doesn't like paying 4k does. \(\color{blue}{\text{End of Quote}}\) How do you know that Preetha sold it because of Jay? Don't make assumptions.
I'm not saying shadow had been accusing jay, I was referring to the fact that this started because inky was accusing jay - which lead to shadow adding his own two cents on the topic
We told you the user in question wasn't using scripts to which you replied, http://prntscr.com/bgu64t http://prntscr.com/bgu6cp Then when that was deleted you posted: http://prntscr.com/bgu6p5 Then when that was deleted you posted: http://prntscr.com/bgu6x1 Then when that was deleted you posted: http://prntscr.com/bgu71h
We warned you for spamming. I'm pretty sure a warning was completely founded there.
The point is, you shouldn't have blamed a user when you don't know the back story. You think you do but there is plenty that you aren't aware of.
I know what spamming is. That's repeatedly posting irrelevant information 3x or 5x or more in a row. This was relevant information.
A relevant opinion
Naming and shaming a user publicly violates the "Be Nice - I will stay positive, be friendly, and not mean" rule. If you have a problem with a user, message a moderator.
LOOOOOOL
lol
inky, jay was punished by preetha herself accordingly, please drop it
o no i missed that
This is a discussion, not a place for moderators to delete opinions that they don't like. This is really immature of you "leaders of OS."
oh inky should have quit while your ahead. rip nite nite.
When you're told that what your saying is wrong. Please stop. There are things you guys don't know, that you guys WON'T know. There is no need to continue harassing users or blaming users for mistakes they made that they have been corrected for. There is no need for you guys to blame another peer for something like this that is out of his control. Everybody wants to point fingers but in this case it's simply counterproductive.
I would appreciate it if this subject was dropped and I think others would as well.
So I was harassing Jay?
No, you were spamming. You were warned. That's all.
Spamming on something we asked to to stop talking about in the atmosphere you were in.
What do you consider to be spamming, in general?
Repeatedly posting the same thing. Whether deleted or not. We said it wasn't necessary and every time we deleted it, you reposted it. If you have any other complaints on this, please email abuse@openstudy.com
This question has been answered.
I posted it twice
That = spam
You posted it four times.
Please refer to the screenshots I posted above.
I posted it twice, then a revised version asking you why you were deleting it. Everyone knows that calling it spam was an excuse. I'm done talking with you, you're hopeless.
Spam is spam. Period.
4x = spam
So what I saw, Shad got bam bam by Snuggie and Jiggie?
no one likes saturday night live anyways
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!