Question

please help

Answer 1

What is the assumption needed to begin an indirect proof of the following statement?

"An angle bisector separates an angle in two equal parts." (4 points)

An angle bisector separates an angle in two equal parts.
An angle bisector separates an angle in three equal parts.
An angle bisector does not separate an angle in three equal parts.
An angle bisector does not separate an angle in two equal parts

Answer 2

@sammixboo @Mehek14 @Mahoganie.Carson

Answer 3

Hello, is this Keystone? If so, I can maybe help.

Answer 4

no

Answer 5

@Ms-Brains

Answer 6

@jim_thompson5910