Ask your own question, for FREE!
English 9 Online
OpenStudy (juan1857):

Can someone help me write a response to an article with about 250 words

OpenStudy (juan1857):

In this era of innovation and increasingly technological advances in communication, it may seem difficult for people to agree with Gladwell’s perspective. However, after reading his article I have felt compelled to concur with his ideology. The presentation of the “weak tie phenomenon” that Gladwell uses is revealed in modern news. Recently there has been many situations that have gone viral including the black lives matter movement, and the increasing spread of the zika virus. Situations of this sort are met only by resentment, and do not lead the way for a significant move of activism. This deficiency may also be looked upon Gladwell’s approach to a hierarchical organization. I have not seen such organization develop among modern day protesters, yet I have seen many posts on social media which reflect people’s disapproval of these issues. Gladwell is indeed aware of what is required to undergo a successful movement of activism.

OpenStudy (juan1857):

this is what i have so far

OpenStudy (juan1857):

I feel like I'm not actually writing a response though

OpenStudy (misssmartiez):

What is the article? What is it about? What is your thesis or overall thing you are trying to get across? What type of response do you actually need? What do you mean by 'response'.

OpenStudy (juan1857):

The article is Small Change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted -it is about the ineffectiveness of social media as a form of assembling activism -I want to qualify the article -By response it says :How will you provide your own claims, your own details to offer you own version of his argument, to agree with hi position, to change his mind, or to take what he says in a new direction? @MissSmartiez

OpenStudy (misssmartiez):

Judging on the fact that I never read the article, I'd say that the instructions are basically saying how you agree, disagree, attempt to persuade him if you disagree and have your own set of thought, or elaborate on what he says to a new extent. Now, I need you to choose. - How do you IN FACT agree with him? Give me a sentence and that will serve as a thesis. Then, take it to a new route steming from that. - If you don't agree, what do you think? what would you say differently and persuade the author to advocate your point? Give me a sentence.

OpenStudy (juan1857):

ok , thank you

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!