Question

the skulls of early human-like creatures were much large in size than the skulls of modern-day humans.
How would a historian most likely describe this statement?
( A ) It is truthful because comparisons of the two skull types provide proof
( B ) It shows bias because determining the size of an object is an opinion.
( C ) It is a fact because the writer is a modern-day human.
( D ) It shows neither fact nor opinion

Answer 1

This is a fact because it has direct evidence with comparisons of the types of skulls, so it wouldn't be an opinion. It's not (C) because just because the writer is a modern-day human doesn't confirm the factual evidence of the statement. So I would say it's most likely (A).

Answer 2

Thank you!