Question

Error in client side code, details and fix below.

Answer 1

This is located in group.js, it results in a "earth quake" effect in math chat whenever a update is made to the chat list...
```
clearInterval(v);return v = setTimeout((function() {return os.scrollChat(x)}), 50);
```

In order to fix this, it can simple be changed to this:
```
clearInterval(v);return v = setTimeout((function() {return os.scrollChat(x)}), 1);
```

Or in theory there doesn't need to be any delay, however I have not tested this, but there should be no reason it shouldn't work.
```
return os.scrollChat(x);
```

Answer 2

@5ever

Answer 3

By updates to the chat list, I mean when a chat is posted/removed or new chats are loaded.

Answer 4

Figured now that something might actually get done about it, i'd start to out with the bugs that can be fixed rather easily.

Answer 5

when/if this gets fixed i'll post another.

Answer 6

This is arguably the most annoying/noticeable bug on OS.

Answer 7

How does this dude do it... :/

Answer 8

How do I do what?

Answer 9

Fine out errors... smh haha

Answer 10

If you can find errors in my essays then I'll hire you, $250 per hours lol

Answer 11

I have like a massive list of them... god do you know how much faster and better I could make the site if I was the dev? LOL

Answer 12

Wow... uhm... As much as I would love to accept that, I'm not good at finding errors in essays @jabez177

Answer 13

I don't even have that much money right now so you're good LOL

Answer 14

LOL

Answer 15

Well, this got off topic.

Answer 16

Hmm...I wouldn't focus as much on the aspect of chats being updated, I'm honestly more concerned with the CoC, TaC and PP links not working :(

Answer 17

Agreed @EclipsedStar

Answer 18

that's easily fixed, but the delay in chat auto scrolling causing a earthquake is extremely annoying as when the chat is active it results in everything becoming essentially impossible to read.

Answer 19

But seriously, they only need to change 1 thing to fix that... Man oh man are the devs failing their job lol.

Answer 20

even if the CoC and TaC links were working, they would still have piles of dust on them... who looks at those things ?

Answer 21

Its simple. The delay is at 50, but he easily makes it a 1. Its not rocket science

Answer 22

And if it works, its something stupid which should have been here from the start

Answer 23

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @Conqueror
even if the CoC and TaC links were working, they would still have piles of dust on them... who looks at those things ?
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
Wrong post...

Answer 24

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @roguehamster2073
And if it works, its something stupid which should have been here from the start
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
its, not an if, i have tested it.
Although honestly it should probably be set at a delay of 0 milliseconds, in other words JS's next tick.

It's not a complete fix because there are still timing issues here and there that I can fix if i look for them, but until i know that something as simple as this will get fixed, i'm not gonna bother.

Answer 25

it's a mostly fix, but you'll still notice a little jumping here and there...

Answer 26

Whaddya mean "Wrong post" ?

Answer 27

I was responding to @EclipsedStar

Answer 28

ah

Answer 29

butt

Answer 30

I'm aware of the bug...

Answer 31

I told you about it in the other post you made

Answer 32

ok