Ask your own question, for FREE!
History 17 Online
OpenStudy (gamingtube):

WELL FAN AND MEDDAL!!!!!!!!!!!!! Who would you rather vote for? and why? IN USA

OpenStudy (gamingtube):

@likeabossssssss @Lauren32583

OpenStudy (gamingtube):

@leeanm

OpenStudy (gamingtube):

@likeabossssssss

OpenStudy (osprey):

C to make History at least. Last time I posted a response to the q I think I got censored by a "99". If you go to @leeanm's post you may be interested. I wonder how Secretary Kerry will feel after Tuesday (relieved it's all over ?). Were C younger, then I would have give K a whirl. I won't be voting though, so these views are irrelevant in terms of the ballot paper. The are only my opinions, and I've had my wrist slapped once for a post in this connection. Win or lose, C seems to have shown expertise in debate (as opposed to arm waving sales pitches), and argument (lawyer style). Both C and T are probably formidable competitors - along the lines of Sir Donald Bradman, Pele, Jack Nicklaus V Tom Watson, Roger Federer vs everyone else, and a few others. Difference seems to be that a lot of the other competitors competed, dare I say it, cleanly ? And with mutual respect. JN got 18 major golf championships - sporting history. RF got 17 grand slam tennis championships - sporting history. Formidable.

OpenStudy (osprey):

One q I haven't addressed is "who do I think will win". Well, T plays golf. In golf there's a thing about 72 holes of major championship golf. The winner is decided over the last nine holes, when the leaders hold their nerve or collapse (Jordan Speith, Greg Norman being to egs of this). As formidable these people are, their margins for error become smaller and smaller as the "final putts" come. T can edge it by a flook if a LONG putt goes in. Woods did that famously at the US masters long time ago to help bolster his "superman" status. But, W "only" got 14 majors, whereas Jack Nicklaus got 18. From this muddled ramble, you may gather that I don't have a clue. Being of a slightly negative disposition, though, I'd reckon that T may just fluke a couple of putts and raise the trophy. And, there is no rationale behind what's said above. Someone once called it "Blue sky thinking", I think. possibly a euphemism for waffle, maybe not ...

OpenStudy (yese30):

i would rather not vote for anyone, the governments are not getting any better and economy is a mess.... now we see more crime, more famine and more disasters, and our presidents don't want to help other leaders, countries from other parts of the world to help us to unite as one.....the government only cares about itself and not about hats better for everyone...there is not going to be any change anytime soon....

OpenStudy (lauren32583):

Trump, its just that simple. I personally do not like any of the choices, but I most certainly do not trust Hillary. -Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, so please do not spam me with hatred comments because I've got enough on both candidates that It is a 50/50.

likeabossssssss (likeabossssssss):

no1 there both going to get us in a war and plz close this is spam

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!