The McDonalds Coffee Case is still one of the most controversial tort cases in recent history. Some felt that the woman should have known that hot coffee posed a risk, while others agreed that McDonalds should have prevented the injury. What do you think? Was Ms. Liebeck more responsible for her injury than the original court decided?

Question

psirockin3 · Answer

I say Ms. Liebeck was more responsible because common sense says "hey, I just bought a coffee, coffee is normally hot." and despite this, she had it between her legs resulting in it burning her crotch

AshtynThatDrummerGirl · Answer

Yeah, I guess so; thank you so much!

psirockin3 · Answer

np