Question

select a court from this site:http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/terms/ot2016/
1: Briefly describe the case.
2: What was the verdict?
3: What was the vote in the decision?
4: Name the part of the Constitution that was involved in the case.
5: Do you agree or disagree with the Court's ruling? Support your opinion.

Answer 1

What do you have so far?

Answer 2

none i need help in all i dont know how to do it

Answer 3

Do you have to do it for all of them or can you choose one?

Answer 4

like i pick one of the courts in the site and do 1-5

Answer 5

Which one did you choose?

Answer 6

you can chose anyone

Answer 7

i haven't chosen one

Answer 8

It's your choice :D, I don't know which one to choose >.<. Find out which one makes the most sense to you

Answer 9

lol ok

Answer 10

i guess Manrique vs US if that's ok with you?

Answer 11

Yes that will be okay. Give me a few seconds :P

Answer 12

ok

Answer 13

Do you know what the arugements about in Manrique vs US?

Answer 14

no idea

Answer 15

Hmmmm, okie. So basically it's stating that Elijah is making a claim dealing with the Forth Amendent,

Answer 16

oh so thats the argument

Answer 17

wait like how do i find 1-5 i dont know where to find it at

Answer 18

1-5? and he/she chose Manrique v. U.S :P

Answer 19

im confused

Answer 20

I don't understand the 1-5 thing o.o and was I right on the arguement @pooja195 ?

Answer 21

i have no idea what is going on

Answer 22

who is pooja

Answer 23

You asked about the 1-5 I dont know what it is :P

Answer 24

She's an old os user

Answer 25

this:1: Briefly describe the case.
2: What was the verdict?
3: What was the vote in the decision?
4: Name the part of the Constitution that was involved in the case.
5: Do you agree or disagree with the Court's ruling? Support your opinion.

Answer 26

?

Answer 27

@pooja195 I think I may need help with the describing o.o

Answer 28

1) Find a description of the case

Answer 29

Marcelo Manrique was convicted in federal court in regards to possession of child pornography

Answer 30

so both of those are #1

Answer 31

2) What was the verdict?
What conclusion did the jury come to?

Answer 32

O.o

Answer 33

"Judgment: Affirmed, 6-2, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on April 19, 2017. Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Sotomayor joined. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of the case."

Answer 34

so thats 2

Answer 35

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @pooja195
Marcelo Manrique was convicted in federal court in regards to possession of child pornography
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
This goes with number 1
But add:
Marcelo Manrique was convicted in federal court in regards to possession of child pornography. He was sentenced to life in prison.
"It also acknowledged that restitution was mandatory but deferred determination
of the restitution amount. Petitioner filed a notice of appeal
from this initial judgment. Months later, the District Court entered
an amended judgment, ordering petitioner to pay restitution to
one of his victims. Petitioner did not file a second notice of appeal
from the amended judgment. When he nonetheless challenged the
restitution amount before the Eleventh Circuit, the Government argued
that he had forfeited his right to do so by failing to file a second
notice of appeal. "

Answer 36

oh ok

Answer 37

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @pooja195
"Judgment: Affirmed, 6-2, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on April 19, 2017. Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Sotomayor joined. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of the case."
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
This is for #2 remember, that you need to change these into your own words

Answer 38

3: What was the vote in the decision?
6-2, this is stated in my previous message

Answer 39

4: Name the part of the Constitution that was involved in the case.

18 U. S. C. §§2252(a)(4)(B)
and (b)(2), an offense requiring a district court to “make restitution to
the victim of the offense,” §3663A(a)(1).
This information was provided on this site:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-7250_3eb4.pdf

Answer 40

5: Do you agree or disagree with the Court's ruling? Support your opinion.
This is your opinion

Answer 41

oh ok thanks so much

Answer 42

You're welcome, please let me know if you have any questions or need further help

Answer 43

Good job pooja