Question

help

Answer 1

@Shadow @Vocaloid

Answer 2

I am guessing A

Answer 3

Yea i agree i think its A

Answer 4

Mincey v Arizona - https://www.oyez.org/cases/1977/77-5353

"The Supreme Court of Arizona held that the warrantless search of Mincey’s apartment was constitutional because it was a search of a murder scene, and that Mincey’s statements were admissible for impeachment purposes, reversing the murder and assault charges on other grounds."

Third Amendment - No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals - a United States Supreme Court case determining the standard for admitting expert testimony in federal courts.

Michigan v Tyler - https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/436/499/

Answer 5

I'm thinking A because the scene is still a crime scene so they wouldn't need a warrant?

Answer 6

You would be correct.

Answer 7

I personaly agree