Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 13 Online
princeevee:

i need help again..

princeevee:

1 attachment
princeevee:

@Vocaloid

Vocaloid:

"if two angles are right angles they sum up to 180" "<P and <Q are right angles" therefore <P + <Q = ?

Vocaloid:

let's look at the first statement "if two angles are right angles they sum up to 180" that means any right angle + any other right angle = 180

Vocaloid:

we are also told that <P and <Q are right angles so using the previous statement, what must <P + <Q equal?

princeevee:

so B?

Vocaloid:

good

princeevee:

1 attachment
princeevee:

i would say this is a bit false

Vocaloid:

good, false (being grumpy is the result of sore feet not shoulders)

princeevee:

1 attachment
princeevee:

i'm thinking it's more of C

Vocaloid:

be careful, just because he makes the postcard does not mean he will necessarily send it to his grandmother

princeevee:

so it's no?

Vocaloid:

good

princeevee:

1 attachment
princeevee:

im leaning towards B at the moment...

princeevee:

but i think i might be wrong

Vocaloid:

the conclusion is correct (if gabriel comes home then hazel gets sleepy) but the law is incorrect, it's law of syllogism not detatchment |dw:1528846066801:dw|

princeevee:

alright, i will remember that.

princeevee:

1 attachment
princeevee:

for Earth, it's obviously true, as the girl went through all the credentials

Vocaloid:

yes

princeevee:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

not 100% sure on this but it seems like the "if" statement was just factually incorrect so what do you think the solution might be?

Vocaloid:

another way to say "if, then" is the conditional statement

princeevee:

my best guess would lean towards that the detatchement law was used incorrectly, but even i cant really put an eye on it

Vocaloid:

just gonna hop on discord and ask for a second opinion

princeevee:

alright

Vocaloid:

actually @Zarkon are you familiar with law of syllogism/detachment? I was having some trouble with this last question

Vocaloid:

ok after double checking w/ the discord, they agree that the issue is with the conditional statement not how the laws are being applied

princeevee:

oh, alright

princeevee:

the next question is kinda similar...

princeevee:

1 attachment
princeevee:

for this one, it's looking like syllogism is used wrong

Vocaloid:

same reasoning as last time the person didn't make any logical errors (the sign said everything in aisle 1 was organic so they naturally assumed a banana from aisle 1 would be organic) so another error in the conditional statement (the sign was false)

princeevee:

oh, sorry,

princeevee:

1 attachment
princeevee:

this one here is false, as even if she drives, the other person still has to wake up

Vocaloid:

good

princeevee:

1 attachment
princeevee:

this one is also false

Vocaloid:

careful about this one, it's law of syllogism if p then q if q then r implies that, if p is true, then r is true

Vocaloid:

applying this to our problem yasmine gets the job --> she will work hard --> she will need a vacation making the statement true

princeevee:

oh, right..

princeevee:

1 attachment
princeevee:

this could be false, because you can't really determine if you sleep well or not, what if the guy has insomnia or something?

Vocaloid:

hm I also agree its false, just for a different reason - it says if he gets home safely he will sleep well, but the issue is that there' no statement/condition about him getting home safely

princeevee:

alrighty!

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!