i need help again..
@Vocaloid
"if two angles are right angles they sum up to 180" "<P and <Q are right angles" therefore <P + <Q = ?
let's look at the first statement "if two angles are right angles they sum up to 180" that means any right angle + any other right angle = 180
we are also told that <P and <Q are right angles so using the previous statement, what must <P + <Q equal?
so B?
good
i would say this is a bit false
good, false (being grumpy is the result of sore feet not shoulders)
i'm thinking it's more of C
be careful, just because he makes the postcard does not mean he will necessarily send it to his grandmother
so it's no?
good
im leaning towards B at the moment...
but i think i might be wrong
the conclusion is correct (if gabriel comes home then hazel gets sleepy) but the law is incorrect, it's law of syllogism not detatchment |dw:1528846066801:dw|
alright, i will remember that.
for Earth, it's obviously true, as the girl went through all the credentials
yes
not 100% sure on this but it seems like the "if" statement was just factually incorrect so what do you think the solution might be?
another way to say "if, then" is the conditional statement
my best guess would lean towards that the detatchement law was used incorrectly, but even i cant really put an eye on it
just gonna hop on discord and ask for a second opinion
alright
actually @Zarkon are you familiar with law of syllogism/detachment? I was having some trouble with this last question
ok after double checking w/ the discord, they agree that the issue is with the conditional statement not how the laws are being applied
oh, alright
the next question is kinda similar...
for this one, it's looking like syllogism is used wrong
same reasoning as last time the person didn't make any logical errors (the sign said everything in aisle 1 was organic so they naturally assumed a banana from aisle 1 would be organic) so another error in the conditional statement (the sign was false)
oh, sorry,
this one here is false, as even if she drives, the other person still has to wake up
good
this one is also false
careful about this one, it's law of syllogism if p then q if q then r implies that, if p is true, then r is true
applying this to our problem yasmine gets the job --> she will work hard --> she will need a vacation making the statement true
oh, right..
this could be false, because you can't really determine if you sleep well or not, what if the guy has insomnia or something?
hm I also agree its false, just for a different reason - it says if he gets home safely he will sleep well, but the issue is that there' no statement/condition about him getting home safely
alrighty!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!