Question

just a few things this time..

Answer 1

@Vocaloid

Answer 2

hm

it appears both angles add up to 180 so you simply have to solve

(3x+6) + (6x+12) = 180 for x

Answer 3

oh, since the question asks for m<ACB not the value of x, you will take that x-value you solved for, and plug it into 6x + 12

Answer 4

so i just gotta figure out what X is, and then answer for ACB?

Answer 5

yes

Answer 6

X=18

Answer 7

so the anser is 120?

Answer 8

good

Answer 9

this one is leaving me a tiny bit stumped

Answer 10

notice how the three angles make up a straight line

so (10x+11) + 40 + 39 = 180 solve for x

Answer 11

just gotta combine like terms

11 + 40 + 39 = 90

so

10x +90 = 180

solve for x

Answer 12

alright.

Answer 13

any ideas? "a figure is a circle if and only if ___________"

Answer 14

o h.

Answer 15

so according to the original statement

a circle is a set of points that are the same distance from a given point

put this together with the "if and only if" gives us...?

Answer 16

it's B. i know..

Answer 17

hm? B? there's nothing in the original statement about being round

Answer 18

" a figure is a circle if and only if it is the set of points that are a fixed distance from a given point" which better matches A

Answer 19

oh..

Answer 20

sorry..

Answer 21

anyways,

Answer 22

any ideas?

as as hint you can re-write any prime number (A) as 1*A

Answer 23

well, they define "composite" number as a number with multiple factors right?

but as we demonstrated, a prime number also has multiple factors (itself and 1)

that being said, what is the best solution?

Answer 24

A?

Answer 25

wait no, it's D

Answer 26

The reason why "a number with multiple factors" is a bad definition for composite is that a prime number also has multiple factors

Which statement closely resembles this idea?

Answer 27

D.

Answer 28

wait, was i right before?

Answer 29

Notice how we wrote a prime number A as the product of A and 1

Therefore prime numbers have ~2 factors~

Answer 30

Which statement best captures this idea?

Answer 31

B

Answer 32

Try to re-read the statements

~prime numbers~ have ~2 factors~

Answer 33

i meant to say C, i'm a tiny bit tired.

Answer 34

Good

Answer 35

this one i already answered, but i want to check

Answer 36

Good that's correct

Answer 37

for this one, i'm thinking B

Answer 38

Hm. Not quite. B is true based on the info given. We'd want the statement that is not always true.

Keep in mind that all three angles must be 60 for a triangle to be equilateral

Answer 39

Notice how statement C only says one of the angles has to be 60 which is false making C the best solution to the problem

Answer 40

Well there's only one statement that's even factually correct

Note that multilingual describes a person not a language

Answer 41

"A person must be multilingual in order to speak multiple languages" try to see which answer choice best matches this idea

Answer 42

C?

Answer 43

Well done

Answer 44

this is true, in my opinion

Answer 45

Good

Answer 46

this one, i think C

Answer 47

Good

Answer 48

A?

Answer 49

Well A is factually true but it's not the best way to rewrite the original statement because we lost a lot of the original information

Answer 50

ah

Answer 51

The key is "can be divided by 7 with no remainder " which must be included in the answer

Answer 52

D then

Answer 53

Close but not quite, it has "7 can be divided by the number" instead of the other way around

Answer C best matches the way the original statement was phrased

Answer 54

this is true.

Answer 55

Good

Answer 56

right?

Answer 57

Has to be converse not conditional

Answer 58

alrighty, thank you again.

Answer 59

i will remember that,

Answer 60

close this question