Question

- than i have the easiest way getting primes using my formula
- may be possible posting it here ?

Answer 1

@Vocaloid

Answer 2

uh

sure go ahead

Answer 3

ok . suppose there is formula ,,F" ,what using we get the numberline

F = { 5,7,11,13,17,19,23,25,29,31,35,37,41,43,47,49,53,55,...}

- and given my edited formula ,Gabor's formula ,,G" ,what using we get the numberline

G = { 25,35,49,55,.... }

- than subtracted numberline G from numberline F we get the numberline of primes P

P = F - G = { 5,7,11,13,17,19,23,25,29,31,35,37,41,43,47,49,53,55,...} -

-{ 25,35,49,55,... } = { 5,7,11,13,17,19,23,37,41,43,53,... }

opinion please ! thank you very much

Answer 4

@Vrefela
@Vocaloid
@Ultrilliam
@Hero
@TheSmartOne
@ThisGirlPretty
@dude
@BlankSpace
@princeevee
@quickstudent

Answer 5

next time let's try not to tag so many people ;_; Only tag people if you know they're experts in what you're doing (only a few people on this website are good at math)

I can ask @angle to double check your sol'n

Answer 6

ok i understand it now - thank you very much - and i wait the @angle 's opinion

Answer 7

How's Gabor's formula determined? I don't see a pattern.

Answer 8

this is my edited formula what using we get this number line ,,G"

Answer 9

function F is easy to find but function G is complicated

Answer 10

G={ 25, 35, 49, 55, 65, 77, 85, 91, 95, 115, 119, 121}

Answer 11

look at the factors of those numbers

Answer 12

5x5
5x7
7x7
5x11
5x13 . ..

Answer 13

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° )

Answer 14

thanks for sharing this! I just found a new code to print primes
i'll work on it this weekend

Answer 15

the sequence G is just the multiplication of two primes taken in ascending order

Answer 16

yes this is true but i ve got ,edited a formula with two variables and so i get this multiplication of two primes in ascending order too - in this way i can editing ,getting the numberline G what subtracted from F result the numberline of primes started with 5

Answer 17

i'm getting a feeling for a super weird matrix exponentiation