Question

https://imgur.com/a/gyrgcuI

https://imgur.com/a/6yuIy0l

https://imgur.com/a/TRmenlj

Answer 1

@Shadow

Answer 2

@Ultrilliam

Answer 3

@Shadow

Answer 4

@Shadow

Answer 5

Which one do you think it is?

Answer 6

angle congruence postulate for the first one

definition of supplemetary angles for the second one

Answer 7

So for the first one, do you have a picture depicting those angles?

Answer 8

Because if there is a picture, then that answer could work.

Answer 9

i'm not sure if it's correct

Answer 10

Actually no, I was thinking of the linear pair postulate. Is there a image depicting these angles. That would help.

Answer 11

yes

first linear pair postulate for the first correct

Answer 12

i checked over

Answer 13

Good. Now onto the second one. Where did they get that 110 degree from? There must be an image for these angles haha.

Answer 14

supplementary angle

Answer 15

Mike where did they get the 110 from?

Answer 16

m<QRT

Answer 17

Yeah but where does it say that the measure of angle QRT is 110 degrees?

Answer 18

at Given

Answer 19

Okay good. They put forward the definition of supplementary angles first. Then they 'substituted' a given value into that equation which illustrated the definition.

Answer 20

definition of supplementary angles is 2nd

Answer 21

that's correct ?

Answer 22

Well they already used the definition. They won’t be using it twice for something that is better defined by something else.