Math checking time: 1.http://prntscr.com/l77lpi 2.http://prntscr.com/l77ltn 3.http://prntscr.com/l77nl1 4.http://prntscr.com/l77nqy 5.http://prntscr.com/l77r0d 6.http://prntscr.com/l77s2l
@Shadow
1st one. B is correct but A is not. N is simply the point it rotates on, it is not part of the triangle.
so its b and d
Correct.
2nd one is correct.
3rd. The 1st blank reasoning is incorrect. It would be substitution property because it plugs in the expression of the segments. 3rd blank reasoning is incorrect too. To get to x = 5 from 4x = 20, you would follow by division property, where you divide 4 from both sides to get x = 5.
so sub subtraction and division
yes
ok
4th one is correct.
5th. the first blank is incorrect, \(\angle 1\) and \(\angle 2\) form a linear pair because they lie on the same line, this is only by `definition of a linear pair`. 2nd blank is incorrect. Due to the two pairs of angles being both equal to 180 then the angles are equal to each other, so they used the `substitution property` getting to the point of \(\angle 1 + \angle 2 = \angle 2 + \angle 3\). 3rd one is incorrect as well. Since we used substitution already we cant use that reasoning, if you see on how we got from \(\angle 1 + \angle 2 = \angle 2 + \angle 3\) to \(\angle 1 = \angle 3\) you noticed the \(\angle 2\) cancels by subtraction from both sides. So you use `Subtraction porperty of equality`. This makes the 2 equal solving it by `Angle congruence postulate`which is for the 4th one.
6th one is correct.
whoops
the lag got me
o-o
welp, wait so they included the point to define that it was equidistant....*facepalm*
how do the others look?
i missed 3 out of 13.
>~>
77%
but its still fine.
;-; sorry
nuu its ok. its better than what i wouldve did
mm okie ;-; today ish not mah day e.e
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!