i need some help please
@Vocaloid
in general % error = 100*(actual-predicted)/predicted
this can get a bit fuzzy because some teachers want you to report either positive or negative percentages while some want only positive percentages
uh...i'm confused still..
just start by plugging the numbers into this % error = 100*(actual-predicted)/predicted
so 100*(5 1/2)/ 6 7/8?
keep in mind the numerator is (actual - predicted) not just actual
\[\frac{ 5\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }-6\frac{ 7 }{ 8 } }{ 6\frac{ 7 }{ 8 } }*100\]
-20?
good after doing a bit of research it seems like most people agree that percent error should be positive, so you would just take the absolute value of -20 to get 20 as the solution
so just 20
yes
says it's incorrect.
.. oh? does -20 work?
no..
...
hm :/ wouldn't know what it would be besides those two options do they give you a different formula?
not at all, though i just simplified the equation
strange. I can ask for another opinion but it's probably an error with the system/answer key if you have other questions I'd be happy to help
i do, but they might not be the ones you can answer
oh. well, it doesn't really hurt to post, either I or someone else might take a look
oh, I would just calculate 6.2% of 47,000 and 1.45% of 47,000 and then just add the results together, however i don't know if the problem is that simple
3595.5
yeah that's what I got as a tentative solution, I wouldn't try unless you have multiple attempts left
technically 0.075 rounds up to 0.08 not 0.07 so just change the last digit to an 8
now this one is just strange
the answer is 7 but...
it's possible that the source material for this question is outdated. hm.
i'm thinking it's eight
wait, it cant be since the source is from 2018
I wouldn't really know either way so go with your best instinct
I ***Believe*** you would just subtract 1377 minus the federal, state, and FICA tax
so just subtract 1337 with the taxes
yes
so it's 7.65% of this number?
so 83.82?
nah, the FICA tax is taken from the original income so 1377 - 41.31 - 200 - (7.65/100)*1377
1030.34?
.35 after rounding but yes
it wants the least amount of tax, so you'd use the least income possible (24,000) so just calculate (6.2 + 1.45)% of 24,000
actually yeah that's how you'd do it, proceed
1836
that it?
yea
good
quick google search tells me sales tax is considered regressive because it is a larger share of income at lower-income brackets https://investinganswers.com/financial-dictionary/tax-center/sales-tax-1533
if your notes/textbook/whatever says its progressive then go with progressive
good
quick search tells me that should be good
order is important, "quotient of z and 9" means z/9 because z comes first
good attempt but it wants 2 consecutive odd integers if you just add 1 to an odd integer you'll get an even integer so to turn odd integer n into the next highest odd integer, you gotta add 2 to get n + 2
so bottom left
yes
following the logic from the previous problem if an even integer is x, the next consecutive even integer is (x+2) not 2x
bottom right again?
there's no 2x term, it's just first even integer = x second even integer = x + 2 x + (x+2) = 42
well you'd want to somehow get "x" by itself, the first obstacle is the +10 standing in the way so do the opposite of + 10
so subtract
exactly, you'd just subtract 10
let x be the original # of high school seniors "1/12 of the seniors signed up for debate" so start with (1/12)x "7 seniors quit" so subtract 7 "leaving 18" so putting it all together (1/12)x - 7 = 18 solve for x
300
good
might have made a mistake with your equation somewhere let x = Jimmy's dollars x + 7 = Tom's dollars x + (x+7) = 71 it wants tom's dollars so solve for x, then find (x+7)
i subtracted 7 from the original and divided by 2
i got 64, and half that is 42
add 7 and that's 49
right?
71 - 7 = 64 64/2 = 32 32 + 7 = 39 not 49
i just realized my mistake,
20 won't work because 20 is not a multiple of 12 start listing out multiples of 12 and stop when you get a multiple that is divisible by both 2 and 5
60?
perfect, so 60 is your sol'n
good
we'll need two equations, one for the total # of coins and one for the total $$$ let p = num. of pennies and d = num. of dimes "twice as many dimes as pennies" so d = 2p "total value of 2.31" so (0.01)p + (0.10)d = 2.31, since obv. a penny is 0.01 of a dollar and a dime is 0.10 of a dollar
since we know that d = 2p, we can replace "d" with "2p" in the second equation, therefore (0.01)p + (0.10)d = 2.31 becomes (0.01)p + (0.10)(2p) = 2.31 at this point you can solve for p the question, however, asks for dimes, so you just have to double the number of pennies to get dimes
22?
good
well you have a -4, right? so what can you add to "eliminate" it?
positive 4?
wait or is it a negative?
well, if we subtracted -4 we would just get m-8=14 which doesn't help but if we add 4 to both sides we get m = 22 which solves the equation so adding positive 4 is the best course of action here
notice you have 7 = -13 + d if we "take away" the -13 we would just get d by itself on the right side so you can subtract -13
3c = 9 we want "c" by itself, so we have to "undo" the multiplication by 3 the opposite of multiplication is, of course, division, so you can just divide both sides by 3 to get c by itself
would that still be 3 though?
good, 9/3 = 3
as a shortcut method if you have a situation like this you can switch the number on the left with the denominator in other words, you can switch a and c and the equation still holds
bottom left?
good
P = 2L + 2W you're given P= 26 and L = 12, plug in, solve for W
1?
good
good
good
good
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!