Question

Claim #1:David likes peanut butter.
Claim#2:Some people who like peanut butter are jerks
Conlusion:David is a jerk
Which best identifies an error in the relevance of this argument?
A.The writer is stereotyping David just because he likes peanut butter
B.A preference or against peanut butter is not valid way to evaluate an individual's personality.
C.The writer has neglected to include a conclusion that explains why David is a jerk.
D.It's possible that David is not among the group of people who like peanut butter and are jerks.

Answer 1

A

Answer 2

Which do you think it is?

Answer 3

D maybe

Answer 4

In this case the problem stems from the assumption that because something may be true for some people, it must be applicable to everyone.

That said, D is not correct.

Answer 5

That said, which one is correct?

Answer 6

AA

Answer 7

A

Answer 8

Correct

Answer 9

thank you again

Answer 10

You're welcome :)