Question

Según investigaciones y teorías de varios países del mundo, si los estudiantes *tuvieran* la oportunidad de aprender de profesores con entrenamiento avanzado, *tienen* un nivel más alto de educación. Si eso es cierto, ¿por qué no hay más profesores con entrenamiento más avanzado? Si el profesionalismo fuera más importante, los estudiantes no *sufrirían* tanto con maestros que les *hacen* perder el tiempo. Si el gobierno *tuviera* más recursos, esto no *sería* un problema tan grande. *¿Podrías* apoyar la educación por ser un defensor del entrenamiento profesional?

Answer 1

Read the paragraph and pay attention to the verbs because one is in the incorrect form. Find the incorrect verb and write it in its correct form. You may copy and paste the accented and special characters from this list if needed: Á, á, É, é, Í, í, Ó, ó, Ú, ú, ü, Ñ, ñ, ¡, ¿

Answer 2

@dude

Answer 3

I think its tienen

Answer 4

@Narad

Answer 5

@Elsa213 @Narad @dude

Answer 6

I think the wrong one is *tienen* and to change the word I think the answer is tuvieran so there will be two tuvieran in the paragraph but I think thats the right answer

Answer 7

@Pixel

Answer 8

Yeah

To be specific, they are not in the same tense

Answer 9

so making the word tuvieran is fine

Answer 10

No

Answer 11

so changing tienen from tuvieran is wrong

Answer 12

The sentence is saying

If they had the chance to do something, then ...

So its going from conditional to future

If they had this, then this would happen

Answer 13

so it's tendrán

Answer 14

I think it's tendrán

Answer 15

Eh mind that, keep it in conditional tense

You wrote it in preterite

It would be tendrían

If they had this, then would have that

Answer 16

Oh okay thank you