Ask your own question, for FREE!
Biology 13 Online
iosangel:

What step of the scientific method comes after analyzing results? making a hypothesis peer review making an observation running an expriment

iosangel:

I think A?

iosangel:

im not sure

Gdeinward:

nope hypothesis comes before an experiment and analysis come after experiment. So the only thing it could be is peer review

Eiwoh2:

Well, analyzing results seems to be near the end of the whole process. So making a hypothesis and observation is out.

Eiwoh2:

An obviously running an experiement after analyzing the results would be strange. So yes, a peer review might be in order after analyzing results.

iosangel:

Oh I thought after analyzing could go back to making a new hypothesis

iosangel:

ok

Gdeinward:

you could, but that is in special circumstances

Eiwoh2:

Yeah, that's if the experiement fails. Then you'd start over with a new hypothesis. But it dosen't mention that possibility here, so the casual thing would be to peer review.

iosangel:

Ok

Gdeinward:

Exactly what I was gonna say Eiwoh.

Eiwoh2:

x'D Ye. Good minds. Hope we helped. :D

iosangel:

Thanks

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!