Question

Which accurately describes a chart developed 20 years after a historical event?

Answer 1

Hi, can you please add the answer choices.

Answer 2

effective secondary source document
too biased for historical evidence
too focused for historical evidence
unreliable narrative source
useful primary source document

major hint: notice how it just says it's a chart (it doesn't say anything about what's in the chart, so we can't make any major conclusions about its bias, focus, or reliability)

narrowing us down to secondary source or primary source. if you're having trouble distinguishing between these two answers, please review the definitions of primary source and secondary source.