Question

Which best explains how Ivanovski’s work led to a change in the germ theory?
He tried to promote his hypothesis as a law.
He used a new experimental method to test his hypothesis.
He used a more powerful bacterial strain than other scientists had.
He obtained results that confirmed what other scientists were thinking.

Answer 1

thoughts? I can eliminate A (hypotheses are not proposed as laws, they're two separate things) and D (confirming what other scientists have already established would not change germ theory)

between B + C which one do you think is more applicable to his work?